An unforgiving week at work comes to an end! The quality of work done was at its worst. Even productivity seemed low. To compensate for that I had to put in the extra time. So somehow I managed to do a greater quantity of work at the cost of quality. quality*quantity = constant! I can’t help that.
Looking to catch up with friends and relax before the new week begins.


![Freakonomics [Revised and Expanded]: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything](http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51Z1scnqz1L._SL160_.jpg)

8 comments ↓
quality*quantity = constant … nice one
To be more accurate,
Quality * Quantity = Constant (For a given amount of time)
for a given person; a tad too obvious but doesn’t hurt clarifying, does it
Ah! Thats every bit as important as the other parameters in the equation.
Thinking further on your equation, there will be people who can exhibit -ve constant for some value of t and some quantity of work for given t.
So, going into details, let me rephrase the parts of the equation to suit my comment.
Quality (QLY) * Quantity (QTY) = Constant (V)
Quantity = work expected in a given time t
Constant = Total amount of value produced by a person in given time t
The situation becomes a little difficult when V goes negative!
For some folks, in a given situation the V may be negative. That is the amount of value added to system is less than the damage done to it.
But then, if the expected amount of work (QTY) for a given time t is less for them, the constant may become positive.
=> V is a function of t and QTY. so, it becomes;
V = F(t, QTY)
so QTY actually might bring V down. V INV proportional to QTY (or QTY squared or something similar)
I would recommend a more complex model to handle this but at this point I think I am lost, so I would leave it to mathematcians like Abhinav (he sounds like one from his blogs) to come up with a model to fit
. Hows that for delegation!
And a passing note, if all of this can be worked out using Function points (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Function_points) as a unit, who knows you might end up creating a productivity model for your team!
I just realized my comment is bigger than the post
. I wasn’t so serious about it and before i realized it became bigger (and may be incoherent-er). Anyways, before this one goes off the hook, i am signing off
Nice analysis DY. I am planning to comprehend and recompile all this and put it in a main post!
[...] Let me carry on from where I left: Relaxed…. [...]
Leave a Comment